as regular readers of love fitness will know, we are neutral on many of the comparisons of good and bad movements.

who doesn't like to hit the big weights? As long as it's within capacity, especially challenging bigger weights gives a more pronounced pump. Training exceptionally well in the moment, and then when the engorgement has passed, nothing seems to change in arm circumference?

deep squats, bench presses and hard pulls are often done, and if your core is not good, you don't see that you are considered strong, your usual core training flow is good, but it will sooner or later be ineffective. Don't get discouraged.

if muscles could talk, there would be one area of muscle that would be complaining desperately to you: Do you think i don't exist if you don't train me?

is free weights or fixed equipment better? You must think how can we ask such a superficial question!

have you ever noticed? There's this phenomenon in the gym: When most beginners consider training their arms, there seems to be a general preference for biceps. While it's nice to have an impressive bicep peak, the real arm dimension comes from the triceps.

who doesn't want developed biceps? The bicep has become one of the most popular movements in the gym.

there is no doubt that pull-ups are the ace move for the back. But many newbies entering the gym are guilty of the fact that pull-ups for self weight training are an absolute contradiction. Why is that?

the criterion for judging fit and unfit is the individual's proprioception of the movement. For example, the butterfly machine clamps the chest, some partners how to do it is difficult to focus, but some partners are able to switch back and forth in one training in the full, half, 3/4 range, comparable to do the bench press.

if we talk about chest training, many people think of the barbell bench press, but if you don't change it for a long time, your muscles will stagnate. Training your pecs like a bodybuilder in a new way gives you at least a qualitative change.